English
Русский
English
References of the article: “Avoiding common problems with statistical analysis of biological experiments using a simple nested data simulator”
  1. Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments

    S. H. Hurlbert

    Ecological Monographs. 1984, 54 (2), 187-211

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661

    Article|Google Scholar

  2. The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?

    S. E. Lazic

    BMC Neuroscience. 2010, 11, 5

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-5

    Article|Google Scholar

  3. What exactly is “N” in cell culture and animal experiments?

    S. E. Lazic, C. J. Clarke-Williams, and M. R. Munafò

    PLoS Biology. 2018, 16 (4), NaN

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005282

    Article|Google Scholar

  4. The effect of clustering on statistical tests: an illustration using classroom environment data

    J. P. Dorman

    Educational Psychology. 2008, 28 (5), 583-595

    https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410801954201

    Article|Google Scholar

  5. SuperPlots: Communicating reproducibility and variability in cell biology.

    Lord SJ, Velle KB, Mullins RD, Fritz-Laylin LK.

    Journal of Cell Biology. 2020, 219 (6), NaN

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202001064

    Article|Google Scholar

  6. Multilevel analysis quantifies variation in the experimental effect while optimizing power and preventing false positives

    E. Aarts, C. V. Dolan, M. Verhage, and S. van der Sluis

    BMC Neuroscience. 2015, 16, NaN

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0228-5

    Article|Google Scholar

  7. https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/

    . , ,

    Google Scholar

  8. Using InVivoStat to perform the statistical analysis of experiments

    S. T. Bate, R. A. Clark, and S. C. Stanford

    Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2017, 31 (6), 644-652

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116682213

    Article|Google Scholar

  9. Selection of the experimental unit in teratology studies

    J. K. Haseman and M. D. Hogan

    Teratology. 1975, 12 (2), 165-171

    https://doi.org/10.1002/tera.1420120209

    Article|Google Scholar

  10. Correcting a Significance Test for Clustering

    L. V. Hedges

    Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2007, 32 (2), 151-179

    https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998606298040

    Article|Google Scholar

  11. Using Effect Size–or Why the P Value Is Not Enough

    G. M. Sullivan and R. Feinn

    Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2012, 4 (3), 279-282

    https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1

    Article|Google Scholar

  12. Use of the Mann–Whitney U-test for clustered data

    B. Rosner and D. Grove

    Statistics in Medicine. 1999, 18 (11), 1387-1400

    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990615)18:11<1387::AID-SIM126>3.0.CO;2-V

    Article|Google Scholar

  13. Handbook of clinical psychology

    J. Cohen and B. B. Wolman

    McGraw-Hill New York. 1965, , 95-121

    Google Scholar